Title: Reasons for refusing to communicate with superiors
Concept:
The concept contains a title, a structure of our project and literature we will use (few scientifical articles that we found in digital library in ODKJ). We decided that we will present problems of bottom-up communication within employees and their superiors. We will focus on the refusal of inferior employees to communicate and find the causes for such behaviour.
In our research we will try to find out why workers hide and do not express their requests and opinions, what they are afraid of, what prevents them from communicating, and whether group communication of subordinates towards their superiors is the only suitable and successful way to communicate. In additition we will try to find suitable solutions or methods to improve bottom-up communication in organization we will observe.
In the empirical part, we will use focus groups and interviews .
Introduction
Organization communication between co workers is very important elements of successful activity of every organization. Fox (2001: 41) describes it as a “complex system of transferring information, chores, plans etc. It sustains of formal communicational network and informal communicational network”. Therefore well structured and successful communications usually brings business success otherwise it is usually an element for lack of success. Good internal communication causes homogeneous labour force.But there is not always like that. Many organizations have great problems with communication especially on the relation between subordinates and their superiors.
Literature:
Publications.
J.A. Robson, P.; Tourish D. (2005): Managing internal communication: an organizational case study, vol. 10, issue 3, retrieved February 20, 2007 from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=/published/emeraldfulltextarticle/pdf/1680100303.pdf.
Berlogar Janko, 1999: Organizacijsko komuniciranje, Gospodarski vestnik, Lujbljana
Bowditch, J.L., Buono, A.
Brunetto Yvonne, 2004: Does the talk affect your walk, Vol. 42, No.3/4, page 579-600, Emerald.
Hypotheses and research questions:
Hypothesis 1: Vigorous communication between subordinates and their superiors leads to more effective performance of their work assignments and more successful activity of entire organization.
1. What holds back subordinates from communicating with their superiors? Why is that so?
2. Is the existent system of communication successful in terms to achieving goals which are set up by the administration in human resource managment (HRM)?
Hypothesis 2: We persume that reasons for refusing to communicate with superiors are conditioned by intrinsic rather than extrinsic reasons.
Research questions:
1. What exactly are intrinsic and extrinsic reasons?
2. What represents internal communication in the organization?
3. What is more stimulated in the organization, horizontal or vertical communication?
4. Do informal groups represent an impendiment in formal communication?
Task distribution: At our third meeting we finalized the distribution of tasks. Bojana will take care of the metodological part of our assignment. That means that she is in charge of interviews with employees, the focus group and the HRM manager. She will prepare the questionnaire and carry out an interview. Igor, Elena and Vesna will all deal with the empirical part of our assignment. Each of them will answer 3 or 4 research questions from our hypotheses. They will start to write our report and thoroughly study our literature. Bojana will also organize the framework for our research.
1) Cvetko Vesna
2) Jurišić Igor
3) Mitrović Bojana
4) Žnidarčić Elena
1) Chair: Jurišič Igor
2) Secretary: Adamović Dijana
3) Progress chaser: Mitrović Bojana
4) Timekeeper: Cvetko Vesna
5) Reserve person: Žnidarčić Elena
Issue 1: roles in the group
member 1 (igor): I suggest that the secretary should be Dijana, the progress chaser and timekeeper should be Bojana (because we have only three members in our group she should take care of both roles). We have accepted two new members in our group- Elena and Vesna. So we also changed the name of our group.
member 2 (vesna): I completly agree with the roles in our group. We have five members, so everyone has one assignment.
Decision 1: We agreed on the topic which we will work on: Bottom-up communication in organizations. (A more specific title of our topic will be decided at our Thursday meeting)
Issue 2: Concept
member 1 (bojana): I managed to contact the organization which we will use for our empirical part of study. They are interested in the same problem so they are willing to help us. We appointed a metting on Thursday, 1st of March. The question form will be prepared in co-operation with Jana Nadoh Bergoč.
member 2 (elena): I agree with the concept we made but I think that we must try to find some more literature which is tematically closer to our task. I found some refereces from SageJournals Online, so I suggest that we all look over that and consider if it fits our title at our next meeting on Friday.
Minutes of the meeting »Reasons for refusing to communicate with superiors«
held on 22 February, 2007 at FDV library
Present: Igor Jurišić, Vesna Cvetko, Elena Žnidarčić, Bojana Mitrović
Absent: Dijana Adamović
Agenda:
1. Action-item follow up
2. The agreement concerning the exact title
3. Concept of the project and literature - distribution of tasks
4. Research methods
5. Any other business
Item 1: Action-item follow up
All assignments from the previous meeting have been carried out except Dijana’s (she is absent today).
Item 2: The agreement concerning the exact title
Discussion: We talked about the exact title for our topic. We all suggested a few proposals,and finally we agreed with Vesna’s one. She suggested a title: “Reasons for refusing to communicate with superiors”. The title was suitable for everyone so we accepted it.
Decision: The chosen topic is “Reasons for refusing to communicate with superiors”.
Item 3: Concept of the project and literature - distribution of tasks
Discussion: We talked about the concept which we had to send to professor Jana Nadoh Bergoč. During the meeting Igor presented the concept he wrote. We added some improvements so we could submit it.
We also talked about the literature which we had found a few days earlier. Elena showed us the literature she had found and also suggested the sources we should use in the future.
Decision:Some of the sources were useless, so we kept only five of them which we included in the concept. But we also agreed that that is not the final list of our literature.
Assignments: So we assigned Elena, Vesna and Igor to proceed with the literature research.
Item 4: Research methods
Discussion: While we were making our concept we came to the conclusion that we should use some kind of research method (either questionnaire or focus group method; we will discuss that with prof. Nadoh Bergoč ). Bojana proposed that we should use an organization X as an example in our research. She said that she knows a human resource director in that organization who can help us. We all agreed with her.
Decision: We will use one of the mentioned methods for our research. The details concerning our method research will be fully determinated at the next meeting.
Assignments: Bojana will meet with HRM director and arrange an interview. Other members will help her create a suitable questionnaire.
Item 5: Any other business
Discussion: We agreed that our work is proceeding as we planned. We have some problems with literature but we are working on it and things will be settled soon. We set a new date for our third meeting. Igor suggested that our third meeting should be on Friday, 2nd of March at ODKJG.
Decision: Third meeting: Friday, 2nd of March at ODKJG.
Assignments: Until then all members must bring reports from their assignments and reports of any kind of problem so we could solve it together.
We made an agreement that at our next meeting we will come up with some new suggestions in order to choose the best material or decisions for our project.
Minutes taker: Elena Žnidarčić
Chair: Igor Jurišić
Minutes of the meeting »Reasons for refusing to communicate with superiors«
held on 2nd of March, 2007 at FDV library
Present: Igor Jurišić, Vesna Cvetko, Elena Žnidarčić, Bojana Mitrović
Absent: Dijana Adamović
Agenda:
1. Action-item follow up
2. Questions for the empirical part of project
3. Draft of hypotheses and research questions
4. Literature
5. Any other business
Item 1: Action-item follow up
All assignments from the previous meeting have been carried out except Dijana's (she will be absent for a longer period).
Item 2: Questions for empirical part of the project
Discussion:
We all participated in choosing the questions. Each one of us propesed a few questions and then we selected the most suitable ones.
We combined the questions for focus group (from 3 to 5 workers), questions for superiors (individual interview) and also questions for the HRM manager.
Decision:
We willl choose the most appropriate questions for the employer, HRM manager and for the focus group until the next meeting. All proposals must be sent to Bojana until the next meeting.
Assignments:
Bojana will collect our proposals and create a draft of questionnaire for the interviews.
Igor volunteered to provide a dictaphone which we will use in our interviews.
Item 3: Draft of our hypothesis and research questions
Discussion: On the basis of the literature we read previously we devised several hypothesis. We picked five most appropriate questions for each hypothesis.
We will publish them on the WIKI and send them to Jana Nadoh Bergoč.
Decision:
Until Friday each of us has to write a few suitable hypotheses, research questions and send them to Bojana.
Assignments:
Bojana will pick the best hypotheses and research questions and she will send them to Jana Nadoh Bergoč until Friday.
Item 4: About the literature
Discussion:
We talked about the literature. Vesna and Elena showed the literature they found on the Internet. Vesna found eight articles and we all took two of them to analyze. She also showed us the draft of our concept, the introduction and theoretical part of our research.
Decision/Assignments:
Until the next meeting each of us has to read the literature (two articles) and summarise the essential parts of the text (analyze them). We also agreed on starting to write our topic.
Item 5: Any other business
Discussion:
We have some problems with the project because we must specify the subject of our investigation. That means we have to find the literature that is most related to our problem. We will set a meeting with prof. Nadoh and consult with her.
Decision:
Our next meeting will be held on Thursday, 13th March at FDV library after our English course.
Minutes taker: Elena Žnidarčić
Chair: Igor Jurišič
Minutes of the meeting »Reasons for refusing to communicate with superiors«
held on 13 March, 2007 at FDV library
Present: Igor Jurišič, Vesna Cvetko, Elena Žnidarčić, Bojana Mitrovič
Absent: Dijana Adamovič
Agenda:
1. Action-item follow up
2. Distribution of tasks
3. Literature
4. Any other business
Item 1: Action-item follow up
All assignments from previous meeting have been carried out except Dijana's (she is absent today). She will be absent for another month, so we decided that she is no longer the member of our group. Dijana agrees with that.
Item 2: Distribution of tasks
Discussion:
We met at the FDV library for distribution of tasks. Igor suggested that Bojana could define the theoretical part and the rest of us will study the remaining literature and look for the answers to our research questions. Since Bojana is in charge of methodological part with organization X, we talked about Igor, Vesna and Elena sharing other project-related tasks.
Decision:
We all agreed with the distribution of tasks and we decided that we must complete them until the next meeting.
Assignments:
Bojana is in charge of the interviews. They will be carried out with the employees, focus group and HRM manager. She also formed the final questions for interviewing employees in organization and she will probably do the whole research next week. Somebody else from the group will accompany her in order to help gathering information/answers. She will also start organizing the framework for our report.
Vesna, Igor and Elena should have studied the literature by the time of our next meeting and have answered the research questions in our hypotheses. Since there are several of them, each of us got four questions. Also, everybody should begin writing our report.
Item 3: Literature
Discussion:
We also discussed the literature because it is too extensive so it will have to be changed. In addition, we must find some other literature dealing with our subject-matter; with our hypotheses and research questions.
Assigments:
Igor, Vesna and Elena will answer the research questions by the next week and thus find additional literature.
Item 4: Any other business
The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, 20 March, 2007 at 10 AM at FDV library.
Minutes taker: Elena
Chair: Igor
Minutes of the meeting »Reasons for refusing to communicate with superiors«
held on 3 April, 2007 at FDV library
Present: Igor Jurišič, Vesna Cvetko, Elena Žnidarčić, Bojana Mitrovič
Absent: Dijana Adamovič
Agenda:
1. Action-item follow up
2. Distribution of tasks
3. Literature
4. Any other business
Item 1: Action-item follow up
All assignments from remaining members of the group V.I.D.E.B. from previous meeting have been carried out.
Item 2: Distribution of tasks
Discussion:
At our last meeting we met at the FDV library to finalize the distribution of tasks. Bojana's duty is to interview HRM (Human Resource Manager), superintendent and focus group in organization X . In order to get more quality information from the interviews she will record them. All other members of the group will help her gather and select the most relevent information for our project from voice recorder. Igor, Elena and Vesna are all assigned to write our seminar and collect as much project-related literature as they can.
Decision:
We all agreed with the distribution of the tasks and we decided that we must complete them as soon as posible because the given time to finalize our project is limited.
Assignments:
Bojana is in charge of the interviews she will carry out with the employees, focus group and HRM manager. Vesna, Igor and Elena should study the literature and continue to write our report.
Item 3: Literature
Discussion:
In the previous week we found some literature dealing with our subject-matter, but Igor, Elena and Vesna are still assigned to try to find even more quality literatute andstudy it well.
Assigments:
Igor, Vesna and Elena must continue to search and read literatute. We all have to write our pert of report, and then we will put it together in a logical whole.
Item 4: Any other business
In case of problems with carrying out our research, we will have another meeting. In case that happens, we will note it in WIKI.
Minutes taker: Vesna
Chair: Igor
Page Information
|
Wiki Information |
Recent PBwiki Blog Posts |